Acute Pain
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 155-159, December 2006

The activity of an acute pain service in a teaching hospital: Five years experience

  • Michal Barak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Rambam Medical Center, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institution of Technology, P.O. Box 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +972 4 8542241; fax: +972 4 8542961.
  • ,
  • Elli Poppa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Rambam Medical Center, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institution of Technology, P.O. Box 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel
  • ,
  • Alex Tansky

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Benjamin Drenger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Hadassa Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Received 20 May 2006; received in revised form 9 August 2006; accepted 15 August 2006.

Summary 

Background

Pain is an integral part of the post-operative recovery process, and ineffective pain management is common. In order to improve treatment of post-operative pain, we have established an acute pain service (APS). The APS team is responsible for the follow up of all surgical patients who are treated post-operatively with continuous epidural (CE) or intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA). These relatively new analgesic techniques enable us to provide better analgesia following intermediate and major surgery.

Purpose

To retrospectively review the extent of CE and IV PCA use in three surgical departments since 1999, during that time period the APS was implemented and working.

Methods

We reviewed data on patients from the Departments of Gynecology, Thoracic Surgery and General Surgery undergoing specific surgical procedures during the first three months of each year from 1999 until 2003. For each surgical procedure, we also identified the number of patients whose pain was controlled by either CE or IV PCA analgesia, as well as recording the duration of analgesic therapy using the two methods.

Results

We observed progressive increases in the number and rate of patients treated by either CE or IV PCA and the number of analgesic treatment days without a significant change in the number of operations in the three surgical departments.

Conclusions

The introduction of APS led to an increase in medical staff's awareness of patient pain and use of new analgesic techniques (CE and IV PCA). This study validates the importance of APS in improving post-operative pain management.

Keywords: Pain, Epidural, Analgesia, Acute pain service

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1366-0071(06)00116-1

doi:10.1016/j.acpain.2006.08.040

Acute Pain
Volume 8, Issue 4 , Pages 155-159, December 2006